NOTICE Notice: This is an old thread. The last post was 2082 days ago. If your post is not directly related to this discussion please consider making a new thread.
Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Mindreading Animals: The Debate over What Animals Know about Other Minds

  1. #1
    Motoko's Avatar
    VETeLiB Administrator

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Work
    Small Animals Practice
    Country
    Venezuela
    Gender
    Female
    Total Posts
    6,041
    Rep Power
    10
    Total thanks received
    784,587
    Thanks for this post
    32
    Small Animals Practice I'm from Venezuela

    Thumbs up Mindreading Animals: The Debate over What Animals Know about Other Minds

    Mindreading Animals
    The Debate over What Animals Know about Other Minds
    by Robert W Lurz




    Pages: 264
    Publisher: --
    Edition: 2011
    Language: English
    ISBN: 978-0262016056

    Desscription

    Animals live in a world of other minds, human and nonhuman, and their well-being and survival often depends on what is going on in the minds of these other creatures. But do animals know that other creatures have minds? And how would we know if they do? In Mindreading Animals, Robert Lurz offers a fresh approach to the hotly debated question of mental-state attribution in nonhuman animals. Some empirical researchers and philosophers claim that some animals are capable of anticipating other creatures' behaviors by interpreting observable cues as signs of underlying mental states; others claim that animals are merely clever behavior-readers, capable of using such cues to anticipate others' behaviors without interpreting them as evidence of underlying mental states. Lurz argues that neither position is compelling, and proposes a way to move the debate, and the field, forward. Lurz presents a new approach to understanding what mindreading in animals might be, offering a bottom-up model of mental-state attribution that is built upon cognitive abilities that animals are known to possess rather than on a preconceived view of the mind applicable to mindreading abilities in humans. Lurz goes on to describe an innovative series of new experimental protocols for animal mindreading research that overcome a persistent methodological problem in the field, known as the "logical problem" or "Povinelli's challenge." These protocols show in detail how various types of animals--from apes to monkeys to ravens to dogs--can be tested for perceptual state and belief attribution.


    Updated 11/07/2013

    Hidden contents (Our Amazon affiliate links)
    You must click 'Thank You' before you can see the data contained here. You can purchase this item from Amazon with discount through our amazon affiliate link.
    BUT You DONOT have sufficient rights to see the hidden data contained here.
    Please Register to see contents.



    Enjoy!
    Last edited by Motoko; 11th July 2013 at 04:03 PM. Reason: UPDATE.
    Hidden Content are to Keep VETeliB Tidy to be Efficient, Practical, Friendly and Appealing.
    Apply Hidden Content for Postings Hidden Content Hidden Content
    Hidden Content Hidden Content Hidden Content
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
    Thanks

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17th July 2012, 05:38 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2nd April 2012, 08:30 PM
  3. Pigs and Hogs (Animals Animals)
    By Tomajwwii in forum Small Animals (Pets) eBooks
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17th November 2011, 02:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •